Meniscus Injuries and MRI Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Meniscus Injuries and MRI - question Paper ExampleThis means that in some anatomical locations, some tear will cure quickly even spontaneously, and in some types of tears, mend would need surgical interventions (Ballas & Stillman, 2009). Therefore, prior diagnosis of the location, disposition, depth, orientation, and extent of the meniscal tear becomes of utmost importance, since this would facilitate the optimum treatment and outcomes within the shortest possible time.This specific dilemma has two parts, one questionable accuracy magnetic reverberance visualise studies and loser of appropriate interpretation of the images to leave behind to a definitive diagnosis unequivocally (Luhmann, Schootman, Gordon, & Wright, 2005). On the other hand, delay for allowance of development of indicative clinical signs or symptoms may lead to permanent damage. Before going into the details of these issues, it would thus be necessary to establish the facts that are known in each of these is sues with an attempt to find relevance betwixt these two, so the evidence base may be available for guiding practice. This issue has been dealt with in up to(predicate) detail in prior searches, and thus there is a need for extended literature polish up to glean what is known. Apart from establishing evidence from the known, it would also serve the purpose of identification of the gaps, so further research may be conducted on these suggestions.Rationale of the Literature ReviewMesiha et al. (2006) indicated the tricky nature of human meniscal healing following injury. It has been observed that meniscus often fails to heal when the injury has caused a tear of more than 1 cm. similar phenomena have been observed when the tear involves the internal two-thirds of the meniscus (Mesiha, Zurakowski, Soriano, Nielson, Zarins, & Murray, 2006). Menetrey and colleagues (2002) reported failure of healing of peripheral device meniscal tears. The failure of recognition of meniscal tears is s o rife that, some authors suggested very high meniscal repair failure rates (Menetrey, Siegrist, & Fritschy, 2002). As Venkatachalam et al. (2001) indicated the healing failure may be very high since many patients persist in asymptomatic even with an existing tear of the meniscus (Venkatachalam, Godsiff, & Harding, 2001) . It can be deduced from these studies that although magnetic resonance imaging is available as a diagnostic imaging musical mode for meniscal injuries, it is questionable whether mathematical function magnetic resonance imaging would be advisable for all suspected cases of meniscal injury or whether in all such(prenominal) cases even after the imaging is done, it would be rational for a radiologist to interpret the image in order to arrive at a diagnosis.Research QuestionThis leads to the research question for this study which is whether routine magnetic resonance imaging for all suspected cases of meniscal tears is optimal, appropriate, or necessary diagnostic modalityIf it